Beijing is grappling with a new challenge after Covid – an expanding war encircling its friends and neighbors. Is China a victim or a contributor to this new conflict? The country may or may not be aware but suspicions are mounting about its role.
War is spreading like a virus during an epidemic. Two years ago, Russia initiated it in Ukraine. Then, as it became stuck in the marshes and bogs of the Dnepr River, war seized onto the decades-long simmering tensions in Gaza and erupted on October 7, 2023, with the Hamas terrorist attack.
It further reignited Houthi pirates’ aggression and is currently fueling threats and brinkmanship on the other end of Eurasia, in North Korea, where Kim Jong Un, with his distinct hairstyle, ominously flaunts newer missiles, bombardments and declarations of war.
Russia clearly initiated the conflict in Ukraine, but less evidently, a Russian shadow can be perceived behind Hamas, the Houthis, North Korea, and the “war fatigue” in some European countries like Italy, barely affected by the fight.
It appears that Moscow, unable to secure victories on the battlefields, is broadening the conflict elsewhere to divert Western military support from Kiev and escalate the clash with the US, hinting “Either you give me what I want in Ukraine or I’ll broaden the war to your doorsteps.”
Russian President Vladimir Putin seems to lack military talent but demonstrates political genius, approaching war as a game of political chess.
However, this approach also backfires on Russia. Countries like Germany, initially lukewarm in their support for Ukraine, have grown to believe that satisfying Putin today will lead to more demands tomorrow.
German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius warned that the war between Russia and Ukraine could expand beyond neighboring countries, citing threats from the Kremlin, especially against Baltic states.
A twist arises in these dire times. China serves as the economic dynamo supporting Russia’s military reindustrialization and economy. However, it’s unclear how much China actively contributes to this geopolitical game or if it’s merely being drawn into a situation it can hardly control.
Beijing might perceive ambiguity as leverage in dealing with the US, given Washington’s interest in minimizing support for Moscow. Simultaneously, Beijing faces a difficult position as Moscow leads the strategy, and Beijing follows without complete control, resembling a junior partner taken for a spin. There’s a risk of being drawn into something China neither wants nor fully comprehends.
Another possibility is that Beijing assumes full control of ongoing wars and conflicts but this is difficult and would involve other types of problems. Overall, there is a question mark: China doesn’t know how the wars will end or who will emerge victorious or defeated. Behind the insecurity lies an even bigger issue.
The question at hand: Is America indeed declining while China is rising and replacing it? Are domestic troubles demolishing America before China faces its own challenges? Or will America emerge ahead of China in a few months or years?
With numerous ambiguities, it appears that either China is the sly mastermind, pulling even Putin’s strings, or it is a puppet in Russian hands. If it’s the former, then China is leading a global war against the West, and sooner or later, it will be treated accordingly. If it’s the latter, Beijing has lost control of itself.
In either case, the situation appears very dangerous from the outside, impacting economic performance and business confidence domestically and internationally in dealing with China.
China’s inclusion in the new American “axis of autocracies” label can be perilous and needs to be addressed cautiously. So far, it has been ignored or hastily rejected in anger, exacerbating the problem rather than solving it.
No one is certain the US will lose in the present wave of wars, so prudence should guide China to find a way to extricate itself from this grim predicament. Perhaps Beijing has been going with the flow without fully grasping the repercussions of what was happening, driven mainly by small-time calculations.
A similar drift occurred with the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). For years, Beijing pushed the BRI, viewing it almost as a small business opportunity while neglecting larger geopolitical concerns. Many attributed this to Beijing’s larger political ambitions, betrayed by small calculations in handling day-by-day operations abroad.
Possibly, even in the present situation, China was initially duped by Putin’s promises of a quick victory in Ukraine, and one thing led to another without a complete comprehension of the dimensions of the problem.
China now seems aware of the North Korean problem. Last week, Communist Party diplomatic chief Liu Jianchao pledged to increase strategic communications as he met a North Korean envoy in Beijing.
In an apparent move to de-escalate the situation, Liu vowed to work with North Korea to protect regional stability as tensions with Seoul escalate. Liu’s meeting appears to be a break from past Chinese laggard reactions to sudden international events.
Still, it’s unclear whether China will manage to broker the restart of a dialogue between Pyongyang and Washington and if Beijing will exert all its weight to stop the spread of the war epidemic.
This essay first appeared on Settimana News and is republished with permission. The original article can be read here.
Can some one tell me exactly what Sisci said?
Sisci says the west, which has carried out 99.9% of all invasions to grab resources, change unfriendly regimes, just test its weapons on unsuspecting populaces, is pure as the driven snow while China is “driving a war epidemic,” the Houthis are pirates, Hamas are “terrorists.”
This article could be described in the exact same way that Shakespeare, in Macbeth, described what life is.
Gonna vote China is driving it based on interviews of NVA soldiers who claimed China, not Russia, was pushing “global revolution through violence” last century. Same party today.
Clickbait essay